State Could be Forced to Borrow to Pay its Bills
During a legislative hearing last week, Minnesota finance officials warned lawmakers the state may need to borrow significant amounts of money this spring in order to meet its financial obligations. The action, which was prompted by lower-than-expected revenues, came just weeks after the state’s Department of Finance was forced to delay corporate and sales tax refunds for the second time in six months, citing concerns over the state’s cash flow situation.
These recent shortfalls underscore both the seriousness and immediacy of the state’s budget crisis.
Last session, the Legislature addressed the problem head on by crafting a responsible budget balancing plan that would have brought long-term stability to the state’s finances. Unfortunately, the Governor vetoed our proposal, and used his unallotment authority to drain our budget reserves and enact one-time spending cuts and shifts to push the problem into the future. As we’re seeing now, the Governor’s temporary fix did nothing to address the long-term fiscal challenges facing our state, and put us in a precarious position of having to borrow just to pay our bills.
While the extent of borrowing the state faces is unknown, Minnesota Management and Budget Commissioner Tom Hanson told lawmakers the state’s tax collections are already $223 million lower than officials predicted earlier this year. In the early 1980s, the state borrowed $1.66 billion over four years, which ultimately cost taxpayers more than $124 million in interest payments. In addition, this type of short-term borrowing will jeopardize the state’s credit rating, which means future borrowing for capital projects could be more expensive.
Minnesota Management and Budget has already begun taking actions to cope with the shortfall. Earlier this month, the state delayed $128 million in corporate tax refunds to 461 companies and $11.9 million in sales tax refunds to about 350 to 400 businesses until late December.
The financial issues facing the state now pale in comparison to the challenge that awaits lawmakers in the next biennium. Because the Governor rejected the Legislature’s long-term budget fix earlier this year, the state is expected to face a budget deficit that could top $7 billion in 2011.